As the circular economy gains traction, technology companies are seeking ways to align profit with sustainability. A recent very scientific study ‘Optimal Trade-In Optimal Trade-In and Pricing Strategy under Strategic Consumers and Sequential Innovation and Pricing Strategy under Strategic Consumers and Sequential Innovation’ from Xue Yant highlights the growing importance of combining trade-in and upgrade programs to appeal to strategic consumers while preserving market competitiveness.
Strategic consumers reshape the market
The number of strategic consumers, those who delay purchases to maximize value, is increasing. As the pool of new buyers declines, companies are shifting their focus to existing customers. Maintaining user engagement through upgrades and trade-ins has become essential to sustain demand and reduce churn.
Sequential innovation and rollout strategy matter
The study introduced four dynamic models to evaluate product rollouts and pricing. A key distinction lies between single and dual rollouts. In a dual rollout, older products remain available at a reduced price alongside newer models, while single rollout strategies phase out the older model. Product pricing is influenced more by rollout strategy than by the presence of a trade-in or upgrade service.
Upgrade programs promise higher profits
When appropriately priced, upgrade programs can outperform standard trade-in options in profitability. They allow brands to target higher-income segments and offer scalable paths for market segmentation. However, if upgrade fees are too low, it undermines trade-in efforts and weakens strategic advantages.
Market share depends on rollout choice
The dual rollout model increases sales of legacy products and helps maintain a larger user base, making it ideal for firms aiming to expand market share. Conversely, single rollout strategies with upgrade paths can boost revenue when product innovation is high and pricing strategies are effectively applied.
Policy tools influence user adoption
Subsidies for trade-ins do not directly improve profits but do increase program participation. Meanwhile, enhancing the upgrade service improves both revenue and customer satisfaction. Nevertheless, these factors do not shift a company’s optimal rollout strategy.
A roadmap for sustainable growth
The study highlights four key lessons for tech companies optimizing trade-in and pricing strategies. First, product pricing and rollout strategy must align; excessive pricing of new models undermines market segmentation. Second, strategic consumers and high innovation levels push prices up, especially under single-rollout models. Third, upgrade programs can yield higher profits than trade-ins, but only with correct service pricing. Finally, strategy choice depends on company goals: single-rollout upgrades boost profits, while dual-rollout upgrades support market share and loyalty. Trade-in subsidies improve participation, not profits, but combined with upgrades, they support sustainable growth and broader consumer engagement.
Via: study
Market

Trade-in

Repair

Refurbishing
