According to press agency Reuters Apple has called on the European Union to repeal the Digital Markets Act (DMA), arguing that the landmark legislation delays the rollout of new features and increases user risks. The U.S. technology company submitted its views as part of the European Commission’s first review of the act, which invited stakeholder feedback until 24 September 2025.
Apple says features face delays
The company explained that compliance with the DMA has forced it to postpone several product updates for EU users. These include Apple iPhone mirroring to Mac, live translation through AirPods and certain location-based functions in Apple Maps. Apple stated that these features cannot currently be adapted to the law’s requirements without affecting user data protection.
Commission insists on compliance
A European Commission spokesperson responded that compliance with the DMA is mandatory, stressing that “gatekeepers, like Apple, must allow interoperability of third-party devices with their operating systems.” The DMA, which came into force last year, is designed to ensure that large technology firms open their platforms to competitors and give users greater choice.
Concerns about user security
Apple warned that the DMA’s requirements are leading to what it calls a “riskier, less intuitive” app experience in Europe. By obliging the company to allow sideloading and alternative app marketplaces, Apple argues that users are more exposed to scams, malware and adult content. The company maintains that safeguards it proposed to the Commission were rejected.
Apple questions long-term benefits
Apple stated, “It’s become clear that we can’t solve every problem the DMA creates.” The company added that instead of helping markets, the legislation is making it harder to do business in Europe. This statement follows earlier adjustments Apple made to its App Store rules and fees in June in response to EU antitrust demands.
Next steps in Brussels
The European Commission’s review of the Digital Markets Act will determine whether changes are needed to strengthen or adjust the framework. While Apple calls for an entirely new approach, regulators remain firm that compliance is not optional. The debate underscores the tension between regulators seeking to rein in large technology companies and industry players who argue that consumer experience and innovation may suffer.
Market

Trade-in

Repair

Refurbishing






